Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to reimbursement of GST or tax on the service portion of the works contract under the tender documents, pre-bid clarification, and subsequent correspondence.
Analysis: The tender and pre-bid clarification were issued in the pre-GST period, but the petitioner's own later letters and the work order showed that GST had been considered in quoting the rate and that the contract amount was inclusive of all taxes. After the introduction of GST, there was no separate scope for payment of service tax outside the GST regime, as the levy on goods and services stood subsumed under the new tax structure. On the facts, the petitioner's claim for reimbursement was unsupported by the contractual record.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to reimbursement of GST or any separate tax on the service portion, and the claim was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the contract, read with the contractor's own subsequent communications and the work order, shows that the quoted amount is inclusive of taxes, no separate reimbursement of GST can be claimed merely because the pre-GST tender documents referred to service tax being paid extra.