Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether service of notice under Order XXI Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 could be accepted through a WhatsApp message and PDF attachment delivered to and opened on the respondent's mobile number.
Analysis: The service record showed that the message and attachment were delivered to the respondent's number and were opened. The respondent was found to have been evading service, and the court treated the WhatsApp communication, together with the accompanying printouts, as sufficient service for the purpose of the notice.
Conclusion: Service of notice through WhatsApp was accepted as sufficient, and the notice was made absolute in favour of the applicant.