Reasoned order requirement in Investor Protection Fund claims: rejection set aside and matter remitted for fresh consideration.

Rejection of an Investor Protection Fund claim was set aside because the exchange's order treated the transaction as a loan without giving adequate reasons. The Tribunal stated that a claim application must be decided by a reasoned order and that the claimant may be given an opportunity of hearing where necessary. The matter was remitted to the exchange for fresh consideration and a new reasoned decision within the stipulated time.

---

---

Issues: Whether the rejection of the appellant's claim under the Investor Protection Fund was liable to be set aside for want of a reasoned decision and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.

Analysis: The claim was rejected on the ground that it was a loan transaction, but the order did not disclose adequate reasons. The Tribunal held that the exchange was required to pass a reasoned order on the claim application and that the appellant could be given an opportunity of hearing if necessary.

Conclusion: The impugned rejection order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the exchange for passing a fresh reasoned order within the stipulated time.

---