Application allowed condoning 103-day delay in filing appeal; respondent objections rejected and delay condoned unconditionally HC allowed the application condoning a 103-day delay in filing the appeal, finding the revenue's explanation for the delay plausible. Objections by the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Application allowed condoning 103-day delay in filing appeal; respondent objections rejected and delay condoned unconditionally
HC allowed the application condoning a 103-day delay in filing the appeal, finding the revenue's explanation for the delay plausible. Objections by the respondent to the condonation were rejected. The delay was condoned unconditionally, permitting the appeal to proceed.
I.A. No.1/2024 seeks condonation of a short delay of 103 days in filing an Appeal; the application is "supported by affidavit." The respondent filed objections "resisting condonation of delay." A "plausible explanation" for the delay was placed on record. After hearing counsel and perusing appeal papers, the court concluded that the application "needs to be allowed" and that the "delay has to be condoned unconditionally, since there is plausible explanation offered for the delay brooked in the matter." I.A. No.1/2024 is disposed of accordingly.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
