Appellants Lose Appeals Due to Repeated Non-Appearance, CESTAT Dismisses Cases for Lack of Prosecution Interest The CESTAT Allahabad dismissed appeals for non-prosecution after repeated appellant absences since October 2018. The Tribunal concluded that the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellants Lose Appeals Due to Repeated Non-Appearance, CESTAT Dismisses Cases for Lack of Prosecution Interest
The CESTAT Allahabad dismissed appeals for non-prosecution after repeated appellant absences since October 2018. The Tribunal concluded that the appellants showed no interest in pursuing their appeals, leading to case dismissal when no adjournment was requested during the hearing.
The Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT Allahabad) dismissed the appeals for non-prosecution due to the appellant's repeated failure to appear despite multiple adjournments since October 2018. The Tribunal held that "the appellants are not interested in pursuing the appeals," leading to dismissal. No adjournment request was made at the hearing, and the order was pronounced in open court by Hon'ble Mrs. Archana Wadhwa.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.