TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Rejects Special Leave Petition, Confirms Lower Court Ruling on Key Legal Principles and Dismisses Pending Applications</h1> <h3>Union of India Versus Vijaya Bharati & Ors.</h3> SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition, upholding the lower court's judgment. The court declined to intervene after hearing arguments from counsel and ... Seeking interim release of cash seized by the Circle Inspector of Police, Mananthavady, in the course of routine patrol duty - who is entitled to interim custody of the cash that has been seized by the Excise Preventive Officer during a routine check inside a bus? - Excise Department has closed the proceedings as they could not detect any wrongdoing on the part of the person from whom the cash was seized - HC held [2023 (9) TMI 1557 - KERALA HIGH COURT] common order passed by the learned Magistrate will stand quashed. Assistant Director, with whom the amounts were entrusted, is ordered to return the amounts released to the learned Magistrate. Magistrate shall release the amount to the 1st petitioner on furnishing a bond for a sum of Rs. 40 lakhs (Rupees Forty Lakhs only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate. HELD THAT:- Heard learned counsel and Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, Additional Solicitor General appearing for the petitioner at length. We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. The Supreme Court, through Hon'ble Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, after hearing learned counsel and the Additional Solicitor General for the petitioner, declined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The Court held: 'The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed.' All pending applications, if any, were also disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
