Repeat relief before the Tribunal was held not maintainable where the same parties had already approached the High Court.

A repeat application seeking permission to operate bank accounts was found not maintainable because the same relief had already been sought and decided between the same parties by the High Court. The Tribunal treated the earlier High Court order as barring a fresh request for identical relief in the same matter. It also noted that any non-compliance with the High Court's order would not bar the appellant from pursuing an appropriate remedy before the proper forum. The application was therefore dismissed as not maintainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the application seeking permission to operate bank accounts was maintainable in view of the earlier order of the High Court between the same parties.

Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the same relief had already been sought before the High Court and an order had been passed. It held that a repeat request for the same relief between the same parties was not maintainable. The Tribunal also noted that non-compliance with the High Court's order, if any, would not preclude the appellant from taking appropriate remedy before the proper forum.

Conclusion: The application was held not maintainable and was dismissed.

---