Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to interim bail on medical grounds and in light of the High Powered Committee guidelines.
Analysis: The petitioner was an undertrial prisoner, had documented medical ailments, had been in custody since October 2018, had satisfactory jail conduct, and had no criminal antecedents apart from the present case. The Court also noted the verified Delhi address, the recording of evidence of private witnesses, and the reduced likelihood of interference with remaining official witnesses. In these circumstances, interim release was considered appropriate, subject to safeguards.
Outcome: Interim bail was granted for 45 days on furnishing bond and surety and on compliance with the stipulated conditions regarding reporting of whereabouts, contact details, territorial restriction, and non-contact with complainants.