Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal, Follows Judgment from Companion Appeal No.34/2012, No Order on Costs Issued. The Bombay HC, with Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and S.C. Gupte, JJ., dismissed the appeal, aligning its decision with the judgment in companion Appeal ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal, Follows Judgment from Companion Appeal No.34/2012, No Order on Costs Issued.
The Bombay HC, with Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and S.C. Gupte, JJ., dismissed the appeal, aligning its decision with the judgment in companion Appeal No.34/2012, which was heard concurrently. The court ruled with no order as to costs.
In the judgment delivered by the Bombay High Court, presided over by Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and S.C. Gupte, JJ., the court addressed an appeal involving the appellant represented by Mr. Kiran Bapat and Mr. Ravindra V. Sankpal, and the official liquidator represented by Mr. L.T. Satelkar. The court noted that the present appeal is governed by the judgment in companion Appeal No.34/2012, which was heard concurrently. Based on the reasons provided in dismissing the companion appeal, the court dismissed the present appeal as well, with no order as to costs.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.