Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's GST payment for running, maintenance, treatment and disposal services relating to the bio-medical waste treatment facility was legally payable and whether the order directing refund of the GST amount could be sustained.
Analysis: The counter affidavit filed by the taxing authority clarified that the petitioner's work fell within the taxable service entries under Notification No. 11/2017-State Tax (Rate) and that the services relating to bio-medical waste treatment and disposal were covered by the specified classification. The record also referred to Notification No. 12/2017-State Tax (Rate), but the clarification furnished by the authority supported the conclusion that the petitioner's GST payment was made in accordance with law and could not be treated as an erroneous payment liable to be refunded to the respondent hospital.
Conclusion: The GST payment was held to be valid and lawful, and the direction requiring refund of the GST amount was quashed. The respondent hospital was also directed to process and pay the pending bills of the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the competent tax authority clarifies that the services rendered are taxable under the applicable GST notifications, the recipient cannot compel the service provider to refund GST paid in accordance with law.