TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to delivery of possession of the scheduled property from the Official Liquidator.
Analysis: The applicants' title and entitlement to the property were not in dispute, and supporting documents were on record. The Official Liquidator also endorsed that the applicants were entitled to possession. In these circumstances, no impediment remained to direct delivery of the property to the applicants.
Conclusion: The application was allowed and the Official Liquidator was directed to hand over possession of the scheduled property to the applicants.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
