Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in a case of provisional release of imported goods pending final assessment, the customs authorities could insist upon a bank guarantee of Rs. 60,00,000 in addition to a bond, or whether the requirement should be modified in light of the governing provisional duty assessment regulations and the circumstances of the case.
Analysis: The petitioner challenged only the condition requiring a bank guarantee, contending that the provisional assessment regime under the Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations, 1963 contemplated execution of a bond and not such a bank guarantee. The department relied on Section 143 of the Customs Act to justify insistence on bond and security. On the facts, the Court found it to modify the condition rather than interfere with provisional release altogether. It also directed expeditious completion of the pending final assessment proceedings so that the parties' ultimate duty liability could be determined.
Conclusion: The bank guarantee requirement was reduced to Rs. 30,00,000, with the balance to be secured by bond, and the writ petition was disposed of with directions for early final assessment.