NDPS bail barred under Section 37 where sampling objections and custody length did not satisfy statutory release conditions.

Bail in a commercial-quantity NDPS prosecution remained barred under Section 37 because the Court was not satisfied that there were reasonable grounds to believe the accused was not guilty or unlikely to reoffend. Alleged defects in sampling and delay in moving the Section 52A application were treated as trial issues, particularly since the seized substance tested positive for heroin and no prima facie prejudice from the irregularities was shown. Prolonged custody and pending trial did not, by themselves, override the statutory embargo or justify release. Bail was therefore refused.

---

---

Issues: Whether bail should be granted in an NDPS case involving commercial quantity of heroin despite objections based on alleged improper sampling, delayed compliance with Section 52A, and prolonged custody.

Analysis: The application was considered under the stringent bail regime of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which requires the Court to be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and will not commit an offence while on bail. The alleged procedural defects in sampling and the delay in moving the Section 52A application were treated as matters to be tested at trial, particularly because the substances had tested positive for heroin and the applicant had not shown prima facie prejudice caused by the alleged irregularities. The Court also noted that although custody had been lengthy, the applicant had not crossed the threshold of incarceration contemplated for relief solely on that ground, and the pendency of the trial did not by itself displace the statutory embargo.

Conclusion: Bail was not granted because the applicant failed to satisfy the requirements for release under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

---