Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a lower appellate court judgment is vitiated for non-compliance with Order 41, Rule 31 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 when the appellant appears but advances no arguments in support of the appeal.
Analysis: The appeal was heard on the basis that counsel for the appellant did not advance any argument and merely requested that the matter be decided on the grounds of appeal. In such a situation, the appellant had not discharged the duty of showing that the decree under appeal was erroneous. The appellate court was therefore not bound to decide the matter on merits merely by referring to the record or to frame a judgment in the manner required when a contested appeal is argued. The absence of arguments justified treatment of the disposal as one for default rather than as a merits adjudication, and the complaint of non-compliance with Order 41, Rule 31 could not be accepted.
Conclusion: The challenge to the lower appellate court judgment failed, and the appeal was not entitled to admission.
Final Conclusion: The dismissal of the appeal was upheld because an appellant who submits no arguments cannot insist on a merits decision under Order 41, Rule 31 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an appellant appears but advances no arguments in support of the appeal, the appellate court is not bound to decide the appeal on merits under Order 41, Rule 31 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and may dispose of it for default.