Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal could be dismissed for non-compliance with the statutory pre-deposit requirement under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973.
Analysis: The appeal was subject to the statutory obligation of depositing the penalty amount before it could be entertained, unless dispensation was granted on the ground of undue hardship. The appellant had already sought dispensation, which was rejected, and thereafter failed to comply with the deposit requirement despite opportunity. The Tribunal relied on the statutory scheme and the settled principle that when an appellant does not comply with the mandatory deposit requirement or with an order passed in relation to it, the appellate authority may reject the appeal and cannot proceed to examine it on merits.
Conclusion: The appeal was liable to be dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement, and dismissal on that ground was justified.
Final Conclusion: The statutory condition for maintaining the appeal was not fulfilled, so the appeal was not entertained and stood dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where pre-deposit of the penalty is mandatory under the governing statute, failure to comply with that requirement or with an order dispensing with it empowers the appellate authority to dismiss the appeal without going into the merits.