1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>India's Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Due to Lack of Legal Representation, Highlights Importance of Active Participation.</h1> The SC of India dismissed the appeal filed by Mysore Sugar Company Ltd. for non-prosecution due to the absence of legal representation. Consequently, all ... Collection of the tax at source from the buyers of goods of arrack - Applicability of section 206C to the contractors/buyers regarding their liability that they were required in law to pay tax to the appellant-companies at source for the relevant period - HELD THAT:- As the appellant-Mysore Sugar Company Limited has not entered appearance through any counsel as such. Appeal filed by the Mysore Sugar Company Limited is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. Issues: Dismissal of appeal for non-prosecution.In the judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of India, it was noted that the appellant, Mysore Sugar Company Limited, did not appear through any counsel. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal filed by the company due to non-prosecution. This decision was made in light of the appellant's failure to engage legal representation. As a result of the dismissal, any pending applications were also disposed of by the Court. The judgment highlights the importance of active participation and representation in legal proceedings, emphasizing the necessity for parties to diligently pursue their cases to ensure a fair and just adjudication.