Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tool-box, folding pole, jack, angle supporter, chains, brake-pipe, pipe stand, draw-bar and tomy supplied with a trailer were components or integral parts of the trailer and therefore liable to be included in its assessable value for excise duty.
Analysis: The trailer remained complete and usable even without the disputed items. The items such as tool-box and jack were separate, portable or attachable accessories and not shown to be essential components without which the trailer would cease to be a manufactured trailer or become unusable. In the absence of proof that the items formed integral parts of the trailer, they could not be treated as excisable components for the purpose of duty valuation.
Conclusion: The disputed items were held to be accessories and not components or integral parts of the trailer, and the duty demand based on their inclusion was set aside in favour of the assessee.