Court rules petitioner not liable for additional funds if prior deposit unreimbursed. Deposit required if funds linked to other cases. The HC of Judicature at Allahabad ruled that the petitioner is not required to deposit additional funds if a previous deposit remains unreimbursed. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court rules petitioner not liable for additional funds if prior deposit unreimbursed. Deposit required if funds linked to other cases.
The HC of Judicature at Allahabad ruled that the petitioner is not required to deposit additional funds if a previous deposit remains unreimbursed. However, if the amount is implicated in other cases, the petitioner must deposit the specified sum. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad heard a case where the Tribunal directed the petitioner to deposit Rs. 2,34,000 during the appeal. If the petitioner has not received a refund of Rs. 7,47,000 deposited earlier, they need not deposit more. If the amount is involved in other proceedings, the petitioner must deposit Rs. 2,34,000 as demanded. The writ petition is disposed of with these directions.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.