Legal Dispute Resolved as Counsel Confirms Compliance, Rendering Contempt Proceedings Unnecessary and Case Effectively Closed HC resolved contempt case after petitioner's counsel confirmed respondent-authority issued required order, rendering the contempt proceedings moot. The ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Legal Dispute Resolved as Counsel Confirms Compliance, Rendering Contempt Proceedings Unnecessary and Case Effectively Closed
HC resolved contempt case after petitioner's counsel confirmed respondent-authority issued required order, rendering the contempt proceedings moot. The Court disposed of the contempt case (Cvl. No.663/2020) as infructuous, effectively concluding the matter without further substantive action.
Issues: Contempt of Court
The High Court of Jharkhand dealt with a contempt case filed by the petitioner, alleging willful violation of a previous order dated 11th September 2019 in W.P(T) No.799 of 2019.
Contempt of Court Issue:
The writ Court directed that if the petitioners had not already preferred applications before the Nodal Officer, they should do so within three weeks from the date of the order. The Nodal Officer was then instructed to forward these claims to the Information Technology Grievances Redressal Committee within a further period of four weeks. The final decisions on these matters were to be taken by the Grievances Redressal Committee expeditiously.
Contempt of Court Resolution:
The learned counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that the contempt case had become infructuous as the respondent-authority had now passed the necessary order. Consequently, Contempt Case (Cvl.) No.663 of 2020 was disposed of accordingly.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
