Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether recovery of the disputed excise duty could be stayed pending disposal of the appeals and the accompanying stay or waiver applications, and whether time-bound directions could be issued for their expeditious consideration.
Analysis: The petitioners had filed appeals along with stay and waiver applications seeking relief against pre-deposit and recovery under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. As the appeals and the applications had remained undecided, and recovery proceedings had been initiated in the meantime, interim protection was warranted to preserve the subject matter of the appeal. The Court also considered the practical difficulty arising from the appellate authority's temporary unavailability and directed an early decision on the appeals or, failing that, on the stay or waiver applications.
Outcome: Recovery of the disputed excise duty was stayed until disposal of the appeals or stay or waiver applications, or until 31 March 1998, whichever was earlier, and the appellate authority was directed to decide the matter within the stipulated period.