Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether granite stone block and pieces sold by the dealer were taxable at 5% under Entry No. 109 of Schedule II Part A pursuant to Notification No. KA.NI-2-421/XI-9(1) dated 31.03.2011, or were liable to be treated as unclassified and taxed at a higher rate.
Analysis: Entry No. 109 specifically included "stone" and expressly excluded only glazed stone, marble and marble chips. The exclusion of those specified items indicated that other forms of stone were intended to remain within the entry unless expressly taken out. The reasoning adopted by the Tribunal, that unprocessed stones would fall within the entry while processed stones would not, was found consistent with the express exclusion of glazed stone. A broader exclusion of granite stone was not warranted when the Legislature had not said so.
Conclusion: Granite stone block and pieces were covered by Entry No. 109 and taxable at 5%. The revision was therefore dismissed against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal's classification of granite stone within the concessional entry was upheld, and the revenue challenge failed.