Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to relief against the Tribunal's pre-deposit order and to a direction permitting the appeal to be entertained on deposit of only 50% of the duty amount.
Analysis: The order under challenge concerned exercise of discretion in a stay/pre-deposit matter. The Court noted the petitioner's financial position and the request for early disposal of the appeal. Without entering into the merits of the demand, the Court moulded the relief by reducing the pre-deposit burden and directing that, upon deposit of 50% of the duty amount within the stipulated time, the appeal be registered and disposed of expeditiously.
Conclusion: Relief was granted to the petitioner by directing pre-deposit of only 50% of the duty amount, with consequent registration and early disposal of the appeal.