Petition challenging confiscation orders dismissed for lack of evidence. Upheld orders to proceed as per law.

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed a petition challenging orders related to the confiscation of goods and penalties imposed on a steel furniture manufacturing firm for alleged misuse of power. The Court found that the petitioners failed to establish a violation of the principle of natural justice as they did not provide sufficient cause for their absence during witness statements or present evidence to support their claim. The impugned orders were upheld, and the authorities were directed to proceed in accordance with the law, with an interim order being vacated.

---

---

Issues: Violation of principle of natural justice

The judgment delivered by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad pertains to a petition filed against impugned orders dated 22-8-1984, 28-9-1979, and 28-6-1979 passed by the Respondents No. 1, 2, and 3 respectively. The petitioners, a steel furniture manufacturing firm, were accused of using power in manufacturing and fabricating steel furniture. The Central Excise Division conducted an inquiry leading to the confiscation of goods, imposition of penalties, and demand for duty payment. The petitioners contended that their right to cross-examine witnesses was violated, thus breaching the principle of natural justice. However, the Court found that the petitioners failed to provide sufficient cause for their absence during witness statements and did not present any documentary or oral evidence to support their claim. Consequently, the Court held that the impugned orders did not suffer from any legal infirmity and dismissed the petition, directing the authorities to proceed in accordance with the law. The interim order dated 10th July, 1985 was also vacated.

---