Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents could be directed to process the petitioner's pending drawback claim under the Customs & Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 1995 and decide it on merits without delay.
Analysis: The claim had remained pending with the respondents for a long time. In the absence of any valid reason for non-disposal, the Court directed the respondents to process the claim in accordance with law, examine it on the merits, and pass consequential orders without unnecessary delay.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to a direction for expeditious consideration of the drawback claim on merits.
Final Conclusion: The petition was disposed of by issuing a mandamus for prompt administrative action on the drawback claim.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory claim remains pending without justification, the authority may be directed to decide it on merits and without undue delay.