Petitioner Wins GST Registration Restoration After Challenging Procedural Flaws in Show-Cause Notice Issuance

HC ruled in favor of petitioner, setting aside GST registration cancellation due to procedural irregularities in show-cause notice. The court found violations of natural justice principles, lacking specific details about alleged invoice misuse. Despite a two-year delay in filing, the HC directed prompt restoration of GST registration, emphasizing continued legal compliance and potential future investigations.

---

---

Issues involved: Impugning the cancellation of Goods and Service Tax (GST) registration due to alleged wrongful issuance of invoices without supply of goods or services, lack of clarity in show-cause notice, violation of principles of natural justice, delay in approaching the court, and restoration of GST registration.

Cancellation of GST registration: The petitioner challenged the cancellation of their GST registration, which was based on a show-cause notice alleging issuance of invoices without supply of goods or services leading to wrongful availment of input tax credit or refund of tax. The notice lacked necessary particulars such as specific invoices, period of issuance, or quantum of wrongful availment, and the cancellation order did not provide reasons or details of the alleged violations, breaching principles of natural justice.

Violation of natural justice: The court noted that the show-cause notice and cancellation order failed to provide essential details or afford the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, as the notice did not specify the venue, date, or time for a personal hearing. The lack of clarity and absence of reasons in the order rendered it deficient and unjust, violating the principles of natural justice.

Delay in approaching the court: Although there was a delay of more than two years in filing the petition after the cancellation of GST registration, the court found that the delay did not harm the petitioner's claim for restoration. The court emphasized that the cancellation was unjust due to procedural flaws, and the delay did not undermine the petitioner's right to challenge the cancellation.

Restoration of GST registration: Considering the procedural irregularities and lack of clarity in the cancellation process, the court allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order cancelling the petitioner's GST registration. The respondent was directed to promptly restore the petitioner's registration, with a reminder that compliance with all legal provisions was still mandatory, and further actions could be taken if violations were found.

Compliance and future steps: The court clarified that the restoration of GST registration did not exempt the petitioner from complying with the law and did not prevent the respondent from taking future actions if any violations were discovered. Additionally, the Central GST authorities were instructed to ensure compliance with the court's order to restore the petitioner's GST registration.

---