CESTAT allows appeal on CENVAT credit for SS waste and MS scrap, revenue fails to prove diversion allegations

CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal regarding incorrect availment of CENVAT credit on inputs including SS Patta/Patti, SS Circle, SS Flat, SS Sheet and MS scrap. The tribunal held that the appellant had correctly availed credit on SS waste and scrap received through dealers, finding no cogent evidence of diversion or replacement. Regarding MS scrap credit, despite revenue's allegations that domestic scrap was received without duty payment, cross-examination revealed witnesses either couldn't remember transaction details or gave contradictory statements. The tribunal found no evidence of cash procurement from open market, flow back of amounts, or identification of domestic scrap suppliers for the substantial 9078 MT quantity involved. Revenue failed to substantiate allegations beyond conjectures, lacking corroborative evidence for serious charges, resulting in demand being quashed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether M/s. Panchmahal Steel Ltd. correctly availed Cenvat Credit on inputs like waste/seconds of SS Patta/Patti, SS Circle, SS Flat, SS sheet, etc.
2. Whether M/s. Panchmahal Steel Ltd. correctly availed Cenvat Credit on duty-paid inputs like MS scrap.

Summary:

Issue 1: Cenvat Credit on SS Patta/Patti, SS Circle, SS Flat, SS Sheet
The main contention was whether M/s. Panchmahal Steel Ltd. had received the SS articles for which they availed Cenvat Credit. The Revenue denied credit based on the assumption that the appellant used virgin material rather than off cuts/defective/seconds/waste SS articles. The impugned order confirmed the demand and imposed penalties on the appellant and various suppliers. The appellant argued that documentary evidence supersedes oral evidence and that they had received and used the defective material in their manufacturing process. The Tribunal noted that the lower authority denied cross-examination of witnesses, making the statements inadmissible. The Tribunal found no evidence of the alleged substitution of prime material with scrap and no proof of flow back of amounts. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant correctly availed Cenvat Credit on SS scrap and set aside the impugned order.

Issue 2: Cenvat Credit on MS Scrap
The dispute involved whether the appellant correctly availed Cenvat Credit on MS scrap, which was allegedly not received. The Revenue's presumption was based on a single instance where domestic scrap was found in the appellant's factory. The appellant argued that they had not availed any credit on the domestic scrap and that the impugned order generalized this single instance to deny credit for all past procurements. The Tribunal found that the Revenue did not substantiate its case with evidence and relied on mere conjectures. The Tribunal held that the appellant correctly availed Cenvat Credit on duty-paid MS scrap and set aside the impugned order.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed all the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders and granting consequential relief to the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of corroborative evidence and the inadmissibility of statements obtained without cross-examination.

---