Payments to Dubai, UAE, and Mauritius entities not subject to TDS under section 40(a)(i) without specific FTS clauses in DTAAs

ITAT Delhi upheld CIT(A)'s order dismissing disallowances under section 40(a)(i) for payments to Dubai Leading Technologies, Brain Point Consultants UAE, and OIT Managed Services Mauritius. The tribunal held that payments for technical services, marketing support, and web hosting services were not chargeable to tax in India due to absence of specific FTS clauses in India-UAE and India-Mauritius DTAAs. Without PE in India, such payments constitute business income not taxable in India, eliminating TDS obligations under section 195. The tribunal rejected revenue's contention that residuary Article 22 provisions could apply for FTS taxation.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Act in respect of payment made to Dubai Leading Technologies UAE.
2. Disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Act in respect of payment made to Brain Point Consultants, UAE.
3. Disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Act in respect of payment made to OIT Managed Services Mauritius.

Summary:

Issue 1: Disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Act in respect of payment made to Dubai Leading Technologies UAE
The Revenue contended that payments made to Dubai Leading Technologies for developing an android app constituted "fees for technical services" (FTS) and were taxable under the Income Tax Act due to the absence of a specific FTS clause in the India-UAE DTAA. The assessee argued that the payments were business income not chargeable to tax in India in the absence of a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s finding that the payments were not taxable under Article 22 of the India-UAE DTAA and were business income not chargeable to tax in India without a PE. Consequently, there was no obligation to deduct tax at source under section 195, making the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) erroneous.

Issue 2: Disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Act in respect of payment made to Brain Point Consultants, UAE
The Revenue argued that payments for market survey and analysis services to Brain Point Consultants, UAE, were FTS and taxable under the Income Tax Act due to the absence of a specific FTS clause in the India-UAE DTAA. The assessee contended that the payments were business income not chargeable to tax in India in the absence of a PE. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s finding that the payments were not FTS and could not be taxed under Article 22 of the India-UAE DTAA. The payments were business income not chargeable to tax in India without a PE, and thus, there was no obligation to deduct tax at source under section 195, making the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) erroneous.

Issue 3: Disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Act in respect of payment made to OIT Managed Services Mauritius
The Revenue claimed that payments to OIT Managed Services Mauritius for Amazon Web Services were in the nature of royalty and FTS, taxable under the Income Tax Act due to the absence of a specific FTS clause in the India-Mauritius DTAA. The assessee argued that the payments were not royalty or FTS and were not chargeable to tax in India. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s finding that the payments for web hosting services were not royalty or FTS, relying on various judicial precedents. The payments were business income not chargeable to tax in India without a PE, and thus, there was no obligation to deduct tax at source under section 195, making the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) erroneous.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s findings that the payments made to Dubai Leading Technologies, Brain Point Consultants, and OIT Managed Services Mauritius were not chargeable to tax in India, and thus, there was no obligation to deduct tax at source under section 195. The disallowances under section 40(a)(i) were held to be erroneous.

---