TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules on income recognition and tax deduction in maintenance contracts dispute</h1> <h3>Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Company Circle - III(2) Versus TVS Electronics Ltd.</h3> Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Company Circle - III(2) Versus TVS Electronics Ltd. - TMI Issues:1. Deletion of addition made on account of unexpired value of Annual Maintenance Contracts.2. Deletion of addition made for non-deduction of tax at source under Section 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Issue 1: Deletion of Addition on Unexpired Value of Annual Maintenance Contracts:The case involved the appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-III, Chennai, regarding two core issues. The first issue was the deletion of an addition made by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) for the unexpired value of Annual Maintenance Contracts (AMCs) received by the assessee. The A.O. contended that income accrued to the assessee at the time of raising the invoice for the AMC and thus the full amount should be shown as income. However, the assessee argued that only the revenue pertaining to the AMCs within the relevant previous year should be recognized. The CIT (Appeals) appreciated the assessee's contention and deleted the addition. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the decision of the CIT (Appeals), stating that the income accrued on a day-to-day basis and the obligation to refund the unexpired value of AMC existed if the contract was canceled by customers. The principle of matching concept of income and expenses supported the assessee's claim, justifying the recognition of income only in the subsequent year.Issue 2: Deletion of Addition for Non-Deduction of Tax at Source:The second issue revolved around the deletion of an addition made under Section 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act. The assessee had made payments to a non-resident company for a market survey, and the A.O. held that tax should have been deducted at source under Section 195 of the Act. The CIT (Appeals) ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the income earned by the non-resident company was not taxable in India as the services were rendered outside India. The ITAT acknowledged that the market survey involved technical knowledge and skill, constituting fees for technical services. However, the ITAT noted that the argument based on the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and Mauritius was not presented before the A.O. The ITAT remitted the issue back to the A.O. for fresh consideration, emphasizing that the provisions of the Act should be applied when DTAA is silent on a particular type of income. The ITAT allowed the Revenue's appeal for statistical purposes.In conclusion, the ITAT upheld the deletion of the addition on the unexpired value of Annual Maintenance Contracts but remitted the issue of non-deduction of tax at source back to the A.O. for reconsideration in light of the DTAA provisions and the Act.
TaxTMI 