Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported polyester film was to be treated as metallised polyester film or as audio magnetic tape, and whether the matter required remand for fresh classification.
Analysis: The imported film was coated with ferric oxide and, on that basis, the finding that it was not metallised polyester film was held to be erroneous. The record also showed a dispute as to whether the film had undergone processes such as leadering, slitting and degaussing so as to make it suitable for use as audio magnetic tape. Since the Tribunal had not dealt with that aspect and the correct classification depended on whether the goods were audio magnetic tape in jumbo rolls or metallised polyester film requiring further processing, the matter had to be sent back for determination of the proper classification.
Conclusion: The appeal was allowed, the impugned judgment and order were set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Tribunal for fresh decision on classification.