Appellant Wins Appeal: Tribunal Confirms Compliance with Rule 4(2)(b) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004; Credit Denial Overturned.

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that they adhered to Rule 4(2)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant had initially availed 100% cenvat credit in 2007-08, which was contested by the Revenue for exceeding the permissible 50%. The Tribunal found that the appellant correctly availed 50% credit in 2007-08, having taken no credit in 2006-07. Consequently, the denial of cenvat credit was overturned, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.

---

---

Issues involved: Denial of cenvat credit on capital goods to the extent of 50% u/s Rule 4(2)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

Summary:

Issue 1: Denial of cenvat credit on capital goods

The appellant appealed against the order denying cenvat credit on capital goods to the extent of 50%. The appellant procured capital goods in 2006-07 and availed 100% cenvat credit in 2007-08 instead of 50%. The Revenue contended that the appellant was entitled to only 50% cenvat credit in 2007-08. Proceedings were initiated to deny 50% cenvat credit availed in 2007-08. The demand was confirmed with interest and penalty. The appellant argued that they were entitled to take 50% credit in 2006-07 and the remaining in 2007-08, which they did. The Tribunal held that the appellant complied with Rule 4(2)(b) as they did not take any credit in 2006-07 and availed the balance in 2007-08. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that they had followed the requirements of Rule 4(2)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The denial of cenvat credit on capital goods to the extent of 50% was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.

---