Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the loss of cement clinker occurring during transport between the assessee's factories was a natural loss entitled to full exemption from excise duty.
Analysis: The loss arose during movement of cement clinker over a substantial distance and was attributable to handling and loading/unloading at intermediate stages. The same question had already been decided in connected writ petitions in favour of the assessee, and the Court expressly agreed with that view. The loss was treated as a natural loss occurring in transit and, therefore, not liable to be burdened with excise duty beyond the exemption already recognised.
Conclusion: The loss of cement clinker in transit was a natural loss and the assessee was entitled to full exemption from excise duty.