Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether bituminised hessian laminated paper was a different product from bituminised water-proof paper so as to deny the benefit of exemption under the relevant notifications.
Analysis: The Tribunal had found that the laminated paper was not a distinct product from bituminised water-proof paper. The finding also indicated that the hessian content in the total product was far below fifty per cent and that in the commercial world the product continued to be known as bituminised water-proof paper. On that footing, interference was not called for.
Conclusion: The product remained covered by the exemption notifications and the challenge failed.