Petition Dismissed as Order Stands; All Related Applications Disposed of Without Further Intervention. The SC dismissed the special leave petition, determining that the impugned order did not warrant interference. All pending applications associated with ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Petition Dismissed as Order Stands; All Related Applications Disposed of Without Further Intervention.
The SC dismissed the special leave petition, determining that the impugned order did not warrant interference. All pending applications associated with the case were also disposed of.
Judges: Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar
Petitioner's Counsel: Mr. S. Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Nagarkatti Kartik Uday, AOR
Respondent's Counsel: Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. P.V. Yogeshwaran, Adv. Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Adv. Mohd Akhil, Adv. Mr. Siddhant Kohli, Adv. Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, Adv.
Decision: The impugned order does not require interference. Special leave petition is dismissed. Pending application(s) also disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.