Tribunal upholds deletion of addition under Income Tax Act, citing shares purchased above Fair Market Value.

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 24,01,57,001 under Section 56(2)(viia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was held that the section did not apply as the shares were purchased at a price higher than the Fair Market Value, and there was no violation of RBI and FEMA regulations as the transaction was commercially expedient.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Applicability of Section 56(2)(viia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Valuation of shares and compliance with RBI and FEMA regulations.

Summary:

Issue 1: Applicability of Section 56(2)(viia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

The Revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 24,01,57,001/- made under Section 56(2)(viia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) had added this amount on the grounds that the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the shares purchased by the assessee was Rs. 815.59 per share, whereas the assessee paid Rs. 2,777 per share. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, stating that Section 56(2)(viia) is not applicable as the shares were purchased at a price higher than the FMV. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that Section 56(2)(viia) applies when shares are received for a consideration less than the FMV, which was not the case here.

Issue 2: Valuation of Shares and Compliance with RBI and FEMA Regulations

The Department argued that the assessee violated RBI and FEMA regulations by purchasing shares at a price higher than the FMV without proper valuation verification. The CIT(A) found that the transaction was commercially expedient and that the purchase price was less than what was agreed upon in previous agreements. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A), noting that the provisions of Section 56(2)(viia) were not applicable as the transaction was at a higher price than the FMV, and thus, there was no tax evasion.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, confirming that the provisions of Section 56(2)(viia) were not attracted in this case, and upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 24,01,57,001/-.

Order Pronounced:

Order pronounced in the open court on 16/06/2023.

---