Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the accused petitioners were entitled to bail in a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 despite the bar under Section 37 of that Act.
Analysis: The petition was considered in the context of the materials in the case diary, the seizure documents, the verification of the invoices and e-way bills, and the fact that the investigation was still pending. The Court took note that the seized documents had been found genuine by the competent authority and that the F.S.L. report was awaited. On that basis, the Court held that continued detention in judicial custody was not warranted for the purpose of the ongoing investigation, notwithstanding the statutory bar.
Conclusion: Bail was granted to the accused petitioners on conditions, subject to their cooperation with the investigating officer and compliance with the terms imposed.