Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether coated rexine cloth manufactured on a cotton base falls within Tariff Item 19(III) as cotton fabrics impregnated, coated or laminated with artificial plastic materials, and whether the predominance or percentage requirements in the tariff item are to be applied to the finished coated product or to the base fabric.
Analysis: Tariff Item 19 expressly includes fabrics impregnated, coated or laminated with preparations of cellulose derivatives or other artificial plastic materials. The proviso and Explanation I make it clear that, for such goods, the predominance or percentage conditions are to be tested with reference to the base fabric, not the finished coated fabric. The item was designed to bring these coated fabrics within the definition of cotton fabrics notwithstanding any common parlance distinction, and the statutory definition controls over trade understanding. The coating material used in the product was also found to be predominantly plastic in character, so the product answered the description in the tariff entry.
Conclusion: The coated rexine cloth was correctly classifiable under Tariff Item 19(III) and duty was payable accordingly; the Revenue succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tariff entry expressly includes coated or laminated fabrics and specifies that predominance or percentage conditions apply to the base fabric, the statutory definition governs classification and excludes a contrary common parlance approach.