Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether aluminium granules/powder manufactured by the assessee were classifiable as aluminium powder under Heading 76.03 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and, if not, whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 180/88 dated 13-5-88.
Analysis: The expression "powder" was specifically defined in Note 6(b) of Section XV of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as products of which 90% or more by weight pass through a sieve having a mesh aperture of 1 mm. Once a statutory definition exists, classification cannot rest on common parlance. The department did not establish that the disputed product satisfied the statutory sieve test, and the chemical examiner's report described the sample as neither aluminium powder, flakes nor granules. On the evidence, the product could not be treated as aluminium powder under Heading 76.03. The Tribunal further found that the granules were covered by sub-heading 76.01 as unwrought aluminium and were manufactured from duty-paid aluminium scrap.
Conclusion: The demand was unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 180/88 dated 13-5-88. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tariff entry contains a specific statutory definition, classification must be determined by that definition and not by common parlance, and the department must prove that the goods satisfy the statutory criteria for the disputed classification.