PVC-impregnated industrial fabrics held under Tariff Item 19(iii); refund claims rejected as time-barred and not maintainable.

Goods manufactured as PVC-impregnated or coated industrial fabrics were held to fall within the extended ambit of erstwhile Tariff Item 19(iii), because the character of the finished product under the old tariff scheme was decisive and the residuary Tariff Item 68 was not applicable. The earlier classification order had attained finality, so the assessee could not reopen the same classification dispute on the same facts and legal basis. On that footing, the refund claims were held time-barred and not maintainable, and the departmental appeals succeeded.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the products manufactured by the assessee were classifiable under erstwhile Tariff Item 19(iii) or Tariff Item 68; (ii) whether the refund claims were time-barred and maintainable.

Issue (i): Whether the products manufactured by the assessee were classifiable under erstwhile Tariff Item 19(iii) or Tariff Item 68.

Analysis: The majority held that the goods were industrial fabrics and that the relevant consideration was the character of the finished product under the old tariff scheme. On the facts found, the products were fabrics impregnated or coated with PVC and fell within the extended ambit of Tariff Item 19(iii). The earlier assessment order had attained finality, and the subsequent attempt to classify the goods under the residuary item was not accepted.

Conclusion: The products were classifiable under erstwhile Tariff Item 19(iii), not Tariff Item 68.

Issue (ii): Whether the refund claims were time-barred and maintainable.

Analysis: The majority held that the prior classification order had become final and the assessee could not reopen the same issue on the same facts and legal basis. On that footing, the refund claims were held to be barred and not maintainable.

Conclusion: The refund claims were time-barred and not maintainable.

Final Conclusion: The departmental appeals succeeded and the assessee's appeal failed, with the goods held classifiable under Tariff Item 19(iii) and the refund claims rejected as barred and untenable.

---