Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        1992 (2) TMI 319 - AT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Industrial textile classification under tariff heading 59.09 prevails over general fabric headings; extended limitation fails absent suppression. Grey cotton belting duck, canvas cloth and man-made grey nylon belting fabrics were treated as industrial-use textile products and classified under ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Industrial textile classification under tariff heading 59.09 prevails over general fabric headings; extended limitation fails absent suppression.

                          Grey cotton belting duck, canvas cloth and man-made grey nylon belting fabrics were treated as industrial-use textile products and classified under Chapter Heading 59.09, because their commercial identity, trade parlance, technical literature and actual use showed suitability for belting, filter cloth and similar technical applications. The ordinary cotton and man-made filament fabric headings were held inapplicable, as the specific technical heading prevailed over the general textile headings. On limitation, the extended period under the proviso to Section 11A was not available because the goods' nature had been disclosed in GP-1s and invoices, so suppression was not established. The demand beyond six months was therefore time-barred.




                          Issues: (i) Whether grey cotton belting duck, canvas cloth and man-made grey nylon belting fabrics were classifiable under Chapter Heading 59.09 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as industrial fabrics, or under Chapter Headings 52.05 and 54.08 as cotton fabrics and fabrics of man-made filament yarn; (ii) whether the extended period under the proviso to Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 could be invoked and the demand beyond six months was sustainable.

                          Issue (i): Whether grey cotton belting duck, canvas cloth and man-made grey nylon belting fabrics were classifiable under Chapter Heading 59.09 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as industrial fabrics, or under Chapter Headings 52.05 and 54.08 as cotton fabrics and fabrics of man-made filament yarn.

                          Analysis: The proper classification was tested on the basis of the tariff scheme, section notes, chapter notes, HSN explanatory notes and commercial understanding of the goods. The goods were found to be marketed and sold as industrial-use fabrics, with the goods themselves stamped for industrial use only, and were shown to be used as belting, filter cloth and similar technical fabrics. Chapter 59 specifically covered textile products and articles of a kind suitable for industrial use, including bolting cloth and straining cloth, whereas Chapters 52 and 54 covered ordinary cotton and man-made filament fabrics. Applying the principle that a specific entry overrides a general entry, and taking note of trade parlance and the technical literature relied upon, the goods were held not to remain within the ordinary fabric headings merely because they were woven or in running length.

                          Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under Chapter Heading 59.09 and not under Chapter Headings 52.05 or 54.08.

                          Issue (ii): Whether the extended period under the proviso to Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 could be invoked and the demand beyond six months was sustainable.

                          Analysis: The description of the goods had been disclosed in the GP-1s and invoices, and the department had knowledge of the nature of the goods. On that basis, suppression of facts was not established and the larger period was not available. The plea that review proceedings under Section 35E barred action under Section 11A was not accepted, but the demand was confined to the normal period in the absence of suppression. The penalty and longer demand could not survive to the extent they rested on the extended limitation.

                          Conclusion: The extended period was held not invocable, and the demand beyond six months was set aside.

                          Final Conclusion: The classification issue was decided in favour of the Revenue, while the limitation issue was decided in favour of the assessee, resulting in partial relief confined to the time-barred portion of the demand.

                          Ratio Decidendi: Goods whose commercial identity, marketing, and technical use place them in the category of industrial-use textile products are classifiable under the specific technical heading of the tariff, and where the goods are fully disclosed in the statutory records, suppression cannot be inferred to sustain the extended period of limitation.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found