Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether PVC foils of thickness not exceeding 0.25 mm were classifiable as films for the purpose of exemption under Notification No. 53/88-CE and Notification No. 14/92-CE.
Analysis: The exemption notifications applied to films of heading 39.20, and Chapter Note 15 of Chapter 39 defined film as sheeting of thickness not exceeding 0.25 mm. The goods were not shown by the Revenue to fall outside that definition. The invoices described the product both as PVC film and as foil, but the recorded thickness ranged from 0.18 mm to 0.25 mm, bringing it within the statutory definition of film. The Revenue also did not produce any independent definition of foil or material to show that the product ceased to be a film merely because it was sometimes described as foil. The reasoning in the cited Supreme Court decision supported the view that the relevant question was whether the goods answered the tariff description of film.
Conclusion: The goods were entitled to be treated as films and the exemption was admissible. The Revenue's appeal failed.