Tribunal upholds Rs. 3,00,000 exemption limit for income under Section 10(10AA) of Income Tax Act

The tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee regarding the restriction of exempted income under Section 10(10AA) of the Income Tax Act, maintaining the exemption limit at Rs. 3,00,000 in line with the provision for private employees. The tribunal acknowledged the potential revision of the limit by the Delhi High Court or through government notifications but upheld the current limit until such revisions occur. The assessee was granted the option to seek relief from the jurisdictional AO if the exemption limit is revised in the future.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Restriction of Exempted Income under Section 10(10AA) of the Income Tax Act.
2. The Assessee's Claim for Full Exemption.
3. Notification and Limit Revision by CBDT.

Summary of Judgment:

Issue 1: Restriction of Exempted Income under Section 10(10AA) of the Income Tax Act

The assessee retired from National Insurance Co. Ltd. and received Rs. 11,97,796 as earned leave encashment. The assessee claimed full exemption under Section 10(10AA)(ii) in the Income Tax return for AY 2020-21. The Centralized Processing Center (CPC) restricted the exemption to Rs. 3,00,000 based on the provision applicable to private employees, resulting in an addition of Rs. 8,97,796 to the income.

Issue 2: The Assessee's Claim for Full Exemption

The assessee contended that the exemption limit should be aligned with the highest paid employee in the central government, currently Rs. 29.25 lakhs. The CIT(A) upheld the CPC's decision, stating that for private employees, the exemption is limited to Rs. 3,00,000 as per the notification dated 31.05.2002.

Issue 3: Notification and Limit Revision by CBDT

The assessee argued that the limit should be revised in line with the increase in government salaries over the years. The Delhi High Court, in a related case, issued a notice to the Union of India regarding the non-revision of the exemption limit since 1998. The Finance Minister, in the budget speech, proposed increasing the limit to Rs. 25 lakhs, but no notification had been issued at the time of the judgment.

Tribunal's Decision:

The tribunal acknowledged the pending proceedings before the Delhi High Court and the Finance Minister's budget proposal. However, it concluded that, in the absence of a revised notification, the current limit of Rs. 3,00,000 must be adhered to. The tribunal dismissed the appeal but allowed the assessee to seek relief if the limit is revised in the future.

Conclusion:

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed with the provision that the assessee may approach the jurisdictional AO for relief if the limit is revised by future notifications or court directions.

---