Bona fide bill of entry filing upheld where expected ship arrival date matched contemporaneous shipping records.

The discussion addresses whether a bill of entry lodged on the basis of an expected ship arrival date could be treated as false or mala fide when the vessel arrived later. It notes that the expected arrival date was supported by contemporaneous shipping journals and matched the information available when the bill was filed. The later arrival of the vessel did not, by itself, show that the original statement was untrue or made with an ulterior motive, and a subsequent revision of the arrival date could not retrospectively make the earlier expectation mala fide. The text states that the writ petition succeeded and relief was granted.

---

---

Issues: Whether the writ petition was to be allowed on the question whether the bill of entry was lodged bona fide on the basis of the expected arrival date of the ship, or whether it was false or mala fide because the vessel actually arrived later.

Analysis: The expected date of arrival shown in the bill of entry was supported by contemporaneous shipping journals and matched the information available at the time of lodgement. The later arrival of the vessel did not by itself establish that the original statement was false or made with an ulterior motive. The subsequent revision of the arrival date could not retroactively render the earlier expectation mala fide.

Conclusion: The Court held that the writ petition succeeded and the reliefs sought were to be granted.

---