Validity of income-tax communications without DIN upheld as invalid where Circular mandates DIN; appeal against tribunal dismissed

Communications issued by the revenue in relation to assessments, appeals, orders and similar actions must be allotted a computer-generated Document Identification Number (DIN) as mandated by Circular 19/2019; absence of a DIN renders such communications without legal standing. The court rejected the revenue's contention that the defect could be cured by recourse to a curative statutory provision, finding the Circular's audit trail requirement and paragraph 4 leave no room for an alternate view; consequently the Tribunal's decision invalidating the final assessment issued without a DIN was sustained and the appeal by the revenue dismissed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of communications issued without Document Identification Number (DIN).
2. Applicability of Section 292B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. Binding nature of CBDT Circulars on the Revenue.

Summary:

1. Validity of Communications Issued Without DIN:
The appeal concerns an order dated 16.09.2022 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for AY 2011-12, which allowed the respondent/assessee's appeal based on CBDT Circular No. 19/2019. This Circular mandates that no communication from the Income Tax Department shall be issued without a computer-generated DIN from 01.10.2019 onwards. The Tribunal found that the final assessment order dated 15.10.2019 did not bear a DIN and was not justified under any exceptional circumstances outlined in paragraph 3 of the Circular. Consequently, per paragraph 4 of the Circular, such a communication is deemed invalid and non-est in law.

2. Applicability of Section 292B of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
The appellant/revenue argued that the failure to allocate DIN was a mere mistake and could be rectified under Section 292B of the Act, which addresses mistakes, defects, or omissions in documents. However, the Tribunal and the High Court found this argument untenable due to the explicit language in paragraph 4 of the 2019 Circular, which invalidates any communication not conforming to its provisions. Hence, Section 292B could not be invoked to validate the assessment order.

3. Binding Nature of CBDT Circulars on the Revenue:
The respondent/assessee contended, supported by several judgments, that the 2019 Circular is binding on the revenue. The High Court reaffirmed that circulars issued by the CBDT under Section 119 of the Act are binding on all officers and persons employed in the execution of the Act. The Court cited the Supreme Court's decision in K.P. Varghese v. Income Tax Officer and other precedents to underline that even if a circular deviates from the statutory provisions, it remains binding on the revenue.

Conclusion:
The High Court concluded that the Tribunal correctly applied the provisions of the 2019 Circular, leading to the invalidation of the final assessment order dated 15.10.2019. The appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal's decision was upheld, emphasizing that there was no substantial question of law requiring further consideration. The Court also noted that any further steps by the Assessing Officer must comply with the law.

---