ITAT condones 97-day delay, quashes registration cancellation under Section 12AA for attempting to unsettle decided matters

ITAT Cuttack condoned 97-day delay in filing appeal against cancellation of registration u/s 12AA, as delay occurred while pursuing writ petition before HC. Tribunal quashed CIT(E)'s order cancelling registration on merits, finding all issues raised in show cause notice had already been decided by appellate authorities and reached finality. CIT(E) impermissibly attempted to unsettle previously decided matters. Order also lacked mandatory Document Identification Number, though this finding suspended pending SC decision in Brandix case. Assessee's appeal allowed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Withdrawal of stay petition.
2. Delay in filing the appeal.
3. Non-availability of Document Identification Number (DIN) in the order.
4. Merits of the cancellation of registration under Section 12AA.
5. Retrospective cancellation of registration.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Withdrawal of Stay Petition:
The assessee's representative submitted a request to withdraw the stay petition No.12/CTK/2023. Consequently, the stay petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

2. Delay in Filing the Appeal:
The appeal was delayed by 97 days due to the assessee initially filing a writ petition before the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court of Orissa. With the permission of the High Court, the writ petition was withdrawn, allowing the assessee to file an appeal to the Tribunal. Considering the delay was due to seeking alternate remedy, the delay in filing the appeal was condoned.

3. Non-availability of Document Identification Number (DIN) in the Order:
The assessee argued that the order passed under Section 12AB(4) on 20.6.2023 did not contain a Document Identification Number (DIN), rendering the order non-est as per CBDT Circular No.19/2019. The Tribunal acknowledged that the circular is binding on the authorities and noted that the order without a DIN is non-est and liable to be quashed. However, this finding is suspended pending the Supreme Court's decision in a related case (CIT vs. Brandix Mauritius Holdings Ltd.).

4. Merits of the Cancellation of Registration under Section 12AA:
- Original Registration and Re-registration: The assessee was initially granted registration under Section 12A and 80G, and subsequently re-registered under the new regime under Section 12AA.
- Show Cause Notices and Replies: The CIT(Exemptions) issued a show cause notice on 6.10.2022, raising seven grounds for cancellation, including issues of corpus donations and the nature of activities being commercial rather than charitable.
- Assessment and Appellate Decisions: The Tribunal noted that the issues raised had already been settled in favor of the assessee by various appellate authorities, including the ITAT and the Hon'ble High Court. Specifically, the microfinance activities were deemed charitable, and the donation to Aids Awareness Trust of Orissa was validated by assessment orders.
- Finality of Issues: The Tribunal emphasized that the CIT(E) cannot unsettle issues already decided by appellate authorities. As such, the order canceling the registration under Section 12AA was quashed on merits.

5. Retrospective Cancellation of Registration:
The Tribunal did not delve deeply into the issue of retrospective cancellation but noted that canceling the registration retrospectively from 1.4.2014 was erroneous. Given that the cancellation itself was quashed, the issue of retrospective application was rendered moot.

Conclusion:
The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the order canceling the registration under Section 12AA was quashed on merits. The stay petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The Tribunal's decision was dictated and pronounced in the open court on 22/04/2024.

---