Secondment reimbursements and professional services receipts were held outside fees for technical services under the India-USA treaty.

Cost-to-cost reimbursement of secondment charges was treated as neither fees for technical services nor fees for included services under the India-USA DTAA, especially where the secondees were taxed as salary in India and the same payment could not be taxed twice in different hands. Receipts for professional services were also held to fall within the treaty's professional services article, since that expression was read as inclusive and not limited to professions regulated by a statutory professional body; the make available test under fees for included services was therefore not decisive. The additions on both heads were deleted, while the penalty ground was left premature.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether reimbursement of secondment charges constituted fees for technical services or fees for included services under the India-USA Double Tax Avoidance Agreement. (ii) Whether receipts for professional services rendered by the assessee were taxable as fees for included services or were covered by the professional services / independent personal services article of the treaty.

Issue (i): Whether reimbursement of secondment charges constituted fees for technical services or fees for included services under the India-USA Double Tax Avoidance Agreement.

Analysis: The same secondment arrangement had already been examined in the assessee's own earlier years. The Tribunal applied the settled position that cost-to-cost reimbursement for seconded employees does not answer the description of fees for technical services or fees for included services, particularly where the seconded personnel are taxed as salary in India and the same amount cannot be taxed twice in different hands.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and the addition on account of secondment charges was deleted.

Issue (ii): Whether receipts for professional services rendered by the assessee were taxable as fees for included services or were covered by the professional services / independent personal services article of the treaty.

Analysis: The Tribunal held that the definition of professional services in the treaty is inclusive and not exhaustive. It held that the concept cannot be restricted to professions regulated by a statutory professional body. Support was drawn from the domestic law understanding of professional services and from the treaty exclusion for amounts paid for professional services to individuals or firms of individuals. On that basis, the make available test under the fees for included services article was not decisive against the assessee, and the receipts were treated as falling within the professional services article.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and the addition on account of professional services income was deleted.

Final Conclusion: The assessment additions on both disputed substantive heads did not survive, and the appeal succeeded on the merits while the penalty ground remained premature.

Ratio Decidendi: Reimbursement for seconded employees cannot be taxed as fees for technical services where the same payments are salary in the hands of the seconded personnel, and treaty references to professional services are to be read as inclusive rather than confined to occupations regulated by a professional body.

---