Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, read with Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, was maintainable for compounding an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after conviction had been upheld and whether the conviction and sentence could be set aside on the basis of compromise and full settlement.
Analysis: Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act enables compounding of the offence under Section 138 at any stage. The Court relied on the settled principle that a compromise between the parties, once the amount in dispute has been paid and the complainant has no objection, can be accepted even after conviction, including after appellate or revisional affirmance. The Court held that the power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure can be exercised to give effect to such settlement and to undo the conviction and sentence already recorded.
Conclusion: The application was maintainable and the offence was permitted to be compounded. The conviction and sentence were quashed, and the petitioner was acquitted.
Ratio Decidendi: An offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act may be compounded at any stage under Section 147, and the High Court may exercise inherent powers to set aside an affirmed conviction once the parties have genuinely settled the matter.