Tribunal adjusts construction costs, upholds tax section for AY 2017-18.

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to spread the valuation difference over the construction period and recompute the cost with adjusted discounts and self-supervision charges. The applicability of Section 115BBE was upheld for AY 2017-18.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Addition of unexplained investment under Section 69 of the IT Act.
2. Valuation discrepancies between DVO and assessee's valuer.
3. Applicability of amended provisions of Section 115BBE.

Summary:

1. Addition of Unexplained Investment:
The assessee, a partnership firm running a hospital, was subject to a survey under Section 133A, leading to a revised income declaration. The Assessing Officer (AO) referred the valuation of the hospital building to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO), who valued it at Rs. 1,76,55,000/-. The assessee's valuer estimated the cost at Rs. 1,10,45,797/-. The AO added the difference of Rs. 66,09,203/- as unexplained investment under Section 69, which was upheld by the CIT (A).

2. Valuation Discrepancies:
The assessee argued that the DVO's valuation was faulty, citing discounts on materials due to the managing partner's reputation, differences in construction quality, and phased construction from 2010-2016. The CIT (A) rejected these arguments, noting the lack of documentary evidence for discounts and the specialized nature of hospital construction. The Tribunal found merit in spreading the difference over the construction period (2009-2016) and directed the AO to recompute the cost considering a 20% discount on materials and 12.5% self-supervision charges.

3. Applicability of Section 115BBE:
The assessee challenged the application of the amended Section 115BBE, arguing it should apply from the date of Presidential assent (15.12.2016). The CIT (A) held that the amendment applied from AY 2017-18. The Tribunal upheld this view, confirming that additions under Section 69 should be taxed at 60% under Section 115BBE for AY 2017-18.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to spread the valuation difference over the construction period and recompute the cost with adjusted discounts and self-supervision charges. The applicability of Section 115BBE was upheld for AY 2017-18.

---