Tribunal directs Transfer Pricing Officer to recalculate PLI and include excluded comparables

The Tribunal allowed the Assessee's appeal, directing the Transfer Pricing Officer to compute the Profit Level Indicator at 11.35% and include previously excluded comparable companies in the analysis. The Tribunal found errors in the TPO's approach, particularly in including non-international transactions in the PLI calculation and excluding certain comparables without proper justification. The Assessee's contentions regarding the treatment of non-international transactions and completeness of information for comparables were upheld, resulting in a favorable outcome for the Assessee.

---

---

Issues:
Transfer Pricing Adjustment - Computation of Profit Level Indicator
Exclusion of Comparable Companies

Analysis:
1. The appeal was filed by the Assessee against the order of the Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2012-13. The Assessee, engaged in IT services and software sales, declared total income of Rs. 1,74,42,014/-. The dispute arose due to international transactions benchmarking for business process outsourcing payments, IT enabled service income, and commission paid on sales. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) made adjustments leading to a total income determination of Rs 4,78,05,409/-, mainly due to transfer pricing adjustments.

2. The Assessee challenged the TPO's computation of Profit Level Indicator (PLI) and the exclusion of certain comparable companies. The TPO included revenue from the sale of software, a non-international transaction, affecting the PLI calculation. The Assessee contended that only international transactions should be considered for PLI comparison. The TPO's exclusion of comparables was also disputed by the Assessee.

3. The Assessee argued that the TPO's inclusion of software sales revenue and cost led to an incorrect PLI calculation. The TPO's decision to exclude certain comparables was challenged based on the completeness of information and functional comparability. The Assessee provided evidence supporting the inclusion of these comparables, highlighting the errors in the TPO's reasoning.

4. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the TPO's approach, particularly regarding the inclusion of non-international transactions in PLI calculation and the exclusion of certain comparables without proper justification. The Tribunal directed the TPO to compute the PLI at 11.35% and include the previously excluded comparable companies in the analysis. The Tribunal concluded that the Assessee's appeal was allowed based on these grounds.

5. In summary, the Tribunal's decision focused on rectifying errors in the TPO's computation of PLI and the exclusion of comparable companies. The Assessee's arguments regarding the correct treatment of non-international transactions and the completeness of information for comparables were upheld, leading to a favorable outcome for the Assessee.

---