Appeal partly allowed, section 263 order quashed for partnership cash deposit, upheld for personal account

The appeal was partly allowed, with the order under section 263 being quashed for the cash deposit belonging to the partnership firm but upheld for the deposit made by the assessee in his personal account for further examination.

---

---

Issues involved:
Condonation of delay in filing appeal, treatment of cash deposits in bank accounts, validity of order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act.

Condonation of delay in filing appeal:
The appeal filed by the assessee was initially barred by 17 days, but a condonation application was submitted along with an affidavit explaining the reasons for the delay. The delay was condoned after the Revenue did not object, and the appeal was subsequently heard.

Treatment of cash deposits in bank accounts:
The assessee, an individual and a partner in a firm, had made cash deposits totaling Rs. 38,16,000 in two bank accounts. One deposit of Rs. 35,66,000 was mistakenly made in the assessee's account but belonged to the partnership firm, as confirmed by the AO of the firm. The AO had examined this deposit during the assessment proceedings and accepted the returned income. The order passed under section 263 of the Act in relation to this deposit was quashed as the AO had already considered and accepted the deposit as belonging to the firm. However, another deposit of Rs. 2,50,000 made by the assessee in his personal account was not adequately examined by the AO, leading to the order under section 263 being upheld for further examination.

Validity of order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act:
The order passed under section 263 of the Act was upheld in part, with the order regarding the cash deposit of Rs. 35,66,000 being quashed as it was found to belong to the partnership firm and had been appropriately examined by the AO of the firm. However, the order was upheld concerning the cash deposit of Rs. 2,50,000 made by the assessee in his personal bank account, as there was insufficient evidence of examination by the AO in this regard.

In conclusion, the appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, with the order under section 263 being quashed for the cash deposit belonging to the partnership firm but upheld for the deposit made by the assessee in his personal account for further examination.

---