Application of mind in summoning orders under Section 204 CrPC is mandatory; mechanical process orders can be quashed.

A summoning order under Section 204 CrPC must reflect conscious application of mind to the complaint and materials before the Magistrate. Even where the complaint discloses a prima facie case and statutory liability of persons in charge of company affairs, process cannot issue mechanically or through a non-speaking order. A summoning order passed without reasoned consideration is liable to be quashed, and the matter should be remitted for fresh consideration and a self-speaking order. The High Court therefore set aside the impugned process order and directed the trial court to pass a fresh reasoned order.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order summoning the accused in the excise complaint was liable to be quashed for want of application of mind and for not being a self-speaking order under Section 204 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Analysis: The complaint disclosed a prima facie case and the statutory liability of persons responsible for the conduct of company affairs was noticed. Even so, the Magistrate was required to consider the facts and circumstances and pass a reasoned order before issuing process. A summoning order passed mechanically, without reflecting application of mind, does not satisfy the requirement of Section 204 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. In such a situation, the proper course is to set aside the order and remit the matter for a fresh speaking order.

Conclusion: The summoning order was quashed and the matter was remitted to the trial court for passing a fresh self-speaking order. The relief was granted in favour of the petitioner.

Final Conclusion: Process under Section 204 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 must rest on a conscious, reasoned judicial consideration, and a mechanically passed summoning order cannot be sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: An order issuing process must show application of mind to the complaint and materials before the Magistrate; if it is mechanical and non-speaking, it is liable to be quashed and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.

---